God is not a person

Substantively speaking, God is not a person. And yet, God can only be interacted with as if God were a person.

Paul Tillich was right: if God is the one in which we live and move and have our being–if God is the very ground, structure, and goal of being–then God is not a being. God cannot be subject to the particulars of being for God is the one that determines those particulars.

And yet, in a poetic way, we claim that God has revealed God’s very self to us–the nature of God. We see evidence of God in nature, which shows us much about God, but it is Jesus Christ whom we claim shows us what it is that God intends.

Jesus Christ–a person–shows us how God–a not-person–intends for us to love all of Creation.

Knowing determines Understanding determines Meaning

How we know what we know determines to a large degree how we understand reality to be constructed. How we understand reality to be constructed determines how we conceive and speak of God’s interaction with creation.

For example: If my epistemology (how I know what I know) tells me that authority rests in a singular figure head at the top of a strict and rigid hierarchy, then I will most likely have a cosmology (how understand reality to be constructed) based on strict hierarchies. This will, in turn, dramatically affect my theology (what I think and communicate about God).

Theology: art, not science

Theology is a very particular (if far reaching) project. When we think, write, and speak theologically, we are attempting to give suggestive shape to our world using the very particular symbols of the faith we inhabit. Theology is, therefore, more of an art–literary and poetic–than a science.

Lenten Lessons from Genesis

During Lent, I am producing some videos for my congregation on the stories of Genesis.  It occurred to me that you all might like them, too.

In addition to the “Bible Study” style videos, I’m also playing with making videos for the children of our congregation so I added those at the end of this post.

I hope you enjoy!

Kids’ videos!

Sinners!

This post is part of the Lenten Blog Tour. Throughout Lent, 41 bloggers are reflecting on 41 passages from the new Common English Bible.

9 As Jesus continued on from there, he saw a man named Matthew sitting at a kiosk for collecting taxes. He said to him, “ Follow me, ” and he got up and followed him. 10 As Jesus sat down to eat in Matthew’s house, many tax collectors and sinners joined Jesus and his disciples at the table.

11 But when the Pharisees saw this, they said to his disciples, “ Why does your teacher eat with tax collectors and sinners? ”

12 When Jesus heard it, he said, “ Healthy people don’t need a doctor, but sick people do. 13 Go and learn what this means: I want mercy and not sacrifice .t I didn’t come to call righteous people, but sinners. ”

Matthew 9:9-13

We know the drill.  We know exactly what we’re supposed to think and feel about this passage.  We’ve been here before.

We are supposed to recognize that Matthew, as a tax collector, is unwanted and unvalued by his society.  In their eyes, he has, “turned his back” to them and begun working for the Romans, the occupiers.  When Jesus comes to Matthew’s house to eat, a plain reading of the text tells us that in addition to the tax collectors, other sinners come round for the feast.

Regardless of the reframing that we try to do, the only word we can ever seem to focus on in this passage is “sinners.”  Matthew was a sinner, his friends were sinners, Jesus ate with he and his friends who were sinners, the Pharisees want to know why Jesus would hang out with such sinners, and Jesus retorts that he did not come for the righteous but the sinners.

Sinner, sinner, sinner.  You’re a sinner, I’m a sinner.  The whole world is full of sinners.  Everybody better stop sinning and being sinners.  Sinners, sinners, sinners.

Don’t misunderstand: I’m not suggesting that we should ignore this reality, present in the text. But I am suggesting that this way of looking at things tends to work us right into the situation Jesus is actually talking about.

Without going into the social reality of the tax collector, it is safe to safe that these folks are despised by their neighbors for they are Jews who are working for the Romans. I’m not sure where they stood on the social hierarchy, but if it is better than where the shepherds and fisherman found themselves, it certainly wasn’t much better.

Rather than focus on the “sinners” aspect of this text, I think we would be better off recognizing that naming Matthew and his fellow tax collectors in the same breath as the other “sinners” says more about Jesus (in this passage) than it does about them.  Because here is the uncomfortable fact: Jesus called outcasts and sinners to be his disciples.

Now, from our modern perspective, this seems like exactly the kind of thing our sweet Jesus would do, but that was completely counter to what a rabbi would do in his day.  Rabbis picked the best and only the best.  They picked people to be their disciples who had already studied the Torah for most of their life.  Tax collectors and fisherman had to stop studying at some point to earn a living.  These were not the top draft picks (so to speak).

So when the Pharisees ask, “Why does your teacher eat with tax collectors and sinners?” they’re not asking why a “holy man” would be caught dead with “sinners.”  They’re asking why a teacher would hang out with stupid people who have no potential to add anything to the discipline of Torah teaching. To their minds, there was a criteria one had to meet in order to be considered worthy of being with a teacher.  This rogue Rabbi from Gallilee screwed that notion up.

The beauty of Jesus is that he pays no attention to what we think are the important qualifications of a disciple.  Jesus makes a point of finding those that no one else wants and saying “Come, follow me.”

So remember, Jesus used to hang out with sinners.  Now he hangs out with us.